<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8532461381024201245</id><updated>2012-02-16T02:04:38.754-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Chase Day Forecast</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://corepuncher.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8532461381024201245/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://corepuncher.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>corepuncher</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12098381647101187953</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://www.corepuncher.com/stormgallery/small/tn_hail.JPG'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8532461381024201245.post-4057438586474300072</id><published>2010-05-17T17:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-17T17:32:26.480-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Day 3:  Wednesday, May 19th 2010</title><content type='html'>Wed is looking like a decent chase day with a moderate shortwave trough emerging over WRN OK by afternoon.  Progged CAPE/SHEAR parameters would support tornadic supercells, maybe not violent but strong tornadoes possible. I'm a bit worried about having too much precip. early on...stuff might go before 21Z.  But, a few HP supercells with tornadoes should emerge out of whatever mess ends up forming.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8532461381024201245-4057438586474300072?l=corepuncher.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://corepuncher.blogspot.com/feeds/4057438586474300072/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://corepuncher.blogspot.com/2010/05/day-3-wednesday-may-19th-2010.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8532461381024201245/posts/default/4057438586474300072'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8532461381024201245/posts/default/4057438586474300072'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://corepuncher.blogspot.com/2010/05/day-3-wednesday-may-19th-2010.html' title='Day 3:  Wednesday, May 19th 2010'/><author><name>corepuncher</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12098381647101187953</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://www.corepuncher.com/stormgallery/small/tn_hail.JPG'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8532461381024201245.post-1774927186816570145</id><published>2010-05-08T16:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-08T16:03:22.515-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Day 3 Forecast:  5/10/10</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;I generally look at the trio of the NAM, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;GFS&lt;/span&gt;, and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;ECMWF&lt;/span&gt; models  when making my forecast 2-3 days out. The &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;consensus&lt;/span&gt;  with all three, is that there is a high likelihood of a tornado outbreak  SOMEWHERE in OK or KS. There are several factors that will determine  WHERE:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) Speed and amplitude of the upper trough -  The EURO  has been the farther East solution, showing the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;dryline&lt;/span&gt; along  or maybe even just East of I 35 in KS and OK. The NAM, on the other  hand, has been farther West, with the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;dryline&lt;/span&gt; across Western OK.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2)  Northward extent of the moist/unstable air mass return (warm front  location) - Tornadoes cannot occur where the surface air is too cold.   This may be the case initially North of the warm front which is forecast  to be over Southern KS. But, strong warm &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;advection&lt;/span&gt;, and  cooling aloft, may allow storms to "be happy" and reside along this  boundary for a while before crossing into the cooler air.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3)  Capping issues with Southward extent - While there is significant  cooling aloft over KS...it begins to dwindle around I-40 and points  South. This is GOOD news for those of you who do NOT want to see strong  tornadoes over SW or &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;CNTRL&lt;/span&gt; OK...but it does NOT PRECLUDE the  possibility of them.  Some capping will also be in place across the  entire moist sector much of the day, which is probably a good thing.  Hopefully, we can sufficiently heat the entire warm sector so that if a  big &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;supercell&lt;/span&gt;  plows into it, it will be sustained.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To me, the main issues  that will determine HOW violent the tornadoes will be will be:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1)  Moisture quality - I have some minor concerns, but even with a 63-64 &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;dewpoint&lt;/span&gt; (low  end of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;progs&lt;/span&gt;)...it  will be more than enough for strong tornadoes.  In my opinion, 66-68+  dews will almost surely result in violent tornadoes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) Width  and quality of the warm sector East of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;dryline&lt;/span&gt; and  South of the warm front - Given a rather dry air mass, and morning rain  over &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;ERN&lt;/span&gt;  KS/OK...there is a possibility that it is too cold just a few counties E  of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;dryline&lt;/span&gt;.   At worst, &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;supercells&lt;/span&gt;  with tornadoes form on the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;dryline&lt;/span&gt; but do not keep producing large,  destructive tornadoes except for a 50-100 mile wide area.  At best (for  chasers), they get better and more self-sustaining with time, and we are  able to observe mile wide wedges for hours.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3) How rapidly  cooling aloft overspreads the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_15"&gt;dryline&lt;/span&gt; - "Lapse rates over 8, tornadoes  will be great" I always say, referring to the temperature lapse rate  between 700 and 500 &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_16"&gt;mb&lt;/span&gt;. They are indeed forecast to be steeper  than that over KS, and into far &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_17"&gt;NRN&lt;/span&gt; OK. It will be so cold aloft into KS,  that even a relatively cool / temperatures in the 60s / air mass MAY  sustain tornadoes with -17 &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_18"&gt;ish&lt;/span&gt; 500 &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_19"&gt;mb&lt;/span&gt; temps.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8532461381024201245-1774927186816570145?l=corepuncher.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://corepuncher.blogspot.com/feeds/1774927186816570145/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://corepuncher.blogspot.com/2010/05/day-3-forecast-51010.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8532461381024201245/posts/default/1774927186816570145'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8532461381024201245/posts/default/1774927186816570145'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://corepuncher.blogspot.com/2010/05/day-3-forecast-51010.html' title='Day 3 Forecast:  5/10/10'/><author><name>corepuncher</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12098381647101187953</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://www.corepuncher.com/stormgallery/small/tn_hail.JPG'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
